Geisler Charles M

Welcome to Lawyers Near Me, your online destination for finding legal professionals in your local area. This profile focuses on Geisler Charles M, an attorney with an office located at 9811 W Bell Rd, Sun City, AZ 85351, USA. Serving the Sun City community, Geisler Charles M appears to be a local legal practitioner. While specific details about the firm's environment are not extensively available online, the address on West Bell Road suggests accessibility for residents in Sun City and surrounding areas. One client review mentions an office in Youngtown as well, indicating a potential presence in a neighboring community.

Information regarding the specific legal services offered by Geisler Charles M is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, attorneys focus on particular areas of law to best serve their clients. These areas can range from estate planning and probate to real estate law, business law, family law, and more. Without explicit information, it is difficult to definitively state the areas of legal practice handled by Geisler Charles M. However, one positive review mentions the preparation of legal documents, suggesting that document drafting is at least one service offered. To understand the full scope of legal services provided, direct contact with the office would be necessary.

The limited client reviews offer contrasting perspectives on the services and professionalism of Geisler Charles M. One reviewer describes Mr. Geisler as having a "nice personality" and notes his community involvement as a volunteer at the local senior center in Sun City. This suggests a positive initial impression and community engagement, which can be reassuring for local residents seeking a lawyer who is connected to the area. However, this same review then details a significant issue with communication and availability. The client recounts that after starting to prepare legal documents, Mr. Geisler became unresponsive, with no return calls, texts, or replies to a letter. The office was reportedly often closed with no one present. After a prolonged period, a message indicated he was on vacation, but the client was still awaiting contact upon his return. This paints a picture of potential unreliability in communication and availability, which could be a significant concern for prospective clients.

In contrast, another reviewer offers a highly positive assessment, stating they have used Mr. Geisler's services three times with "outstanding" results each time. This client praises his demeanor, describing him as having "no high pressure" and "no 'shark like' behavior," which suggests a client-friendly and ethical approach. The reviewer further characterizes him as "a good, honest, diligent and strong attorney" and expresses no hesitation in recommending his services. This feedback highlights positive aspects such as effective legal outcomes, an ethical approach, diligence, and competence. The reviewer, identifying themselves as Glen Littell from Surprise, Arizona, provides a strong personal endorsement.

Considering these two contrasting reviews, it is challenging to form a definitive overall assessment. The positive review speaks to the quality of legal work and professional conduct when services are rendered. However, the negative review raises serious concerns about communication and reliability, which are crucial aspects of any professional service. It is possible that the negative experience was an isolated incident or due to unforeseen circumstances, but the lack of communication for an extended period is nonetheless troubling. Prospective clients should be aware of these differing experiences.

Regarding features of Geisler Charles M's practice, the positive review suggests qualities such as honesty, diligence, and strength as an attorney, coupled with a non-pressuring and ethical approach. The community involvement mentioned in the negative review could also be seen as a feature, indicating a connection to the local Sun City community. However, the communication issues raised in the negative review could be a significant drawback for some clients.

Promotional information is limited. The mention of an office in Youngtown and volunteer work at the Sun City senior center could be seen as ways Mr. Geisler connects with the local community. The positive testimonial from Glen Littell serves as a strong form of word-of-mouth promotion, highlighting successful outcomes and positive professional attributes. However, the negative experience shared by another potential client might counteract some of this positive promotion, emphasizing the importance of reliable communication and availability.

In conclusion, Geisler Charles M, located in Sun City, Arizona, appears to be an attorney with ties to the local community, as indicated by his office location and volunteer work. While one client review praises his effectiveness, honesty, and ethical approach based on multiple positive experiences, another review details significant issues with unresponsiveness and lack of communication. Prospective clients should consider these contrasting viewpoints when evaluating whether to engage Mr. Geisler's services. It would be prudent to seek further information or clarification regarding communication practices and availability before making a decision. The positive testimonial suggests that when engaged, Mr. Geisler can provide outstanding legal results with a commendable professional demeanor. However, the concerns raised about communication and availability warrant careful consideration.