Hayward Samuel G

For individuals seeking legal representation in Louisville, Kentucky, platforms like "Lawyers Near Me" provide a directory of local attorneys. This introduction aims to provide an objective overview of the services and client experiences associated with Hayward Samuel G, who had an office at 1009 S 4th St, Louisville, KY 40203, USA, with phone numbers (502) 584-2111 and +1 502-584-2111. It is important to note that one of the provided reviews indicates the passing of Mr. Samuel G. Hayward, Sr., suggesting that he may no longer be practicing law. Therefore, this introduction serves as a historical overview based on past client interactions.

Given the information available, it is challenging to describe the current environment of the practice under Hayward Samuel G, as the passing of the named attorney may have resulted in significant changes or closure. Historically, law offices aim to provide a professional setting for client consultations and legal work. The location on South 4th Street in Louisville suggests accessibility within a potentially central area of the city.

Based on the provided client reviews, Hayward Samuel G appears to have handled cases involving defamation and worker discrimination, specifically related to FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act) and ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act). One positive review from 2021 describes Mr. Hayward's thorough initial consultation in a defamation case, his willingness to refund the full retainer fee upon his inability to continue due to health reasons, the prompt return of the client's file with his notes, and a letter of endorsement for other attorneys. This suggests that, at least in this instance, Mr. Hayward provided diligent initial service and acted with integrity in his withdrawal from the case.

However, a subsequent review presents a significantly different experience in a worker discrimination case involving FMLA and ADA. This client paid a retainer fee for representation but reports a lack of communication and progress on their case over a period of time, despite assurances from the office. The client describes a deposition that occurred but was followed by further "silence," leading to the conclusion that the retainer fee was spent on "bogus" representation and a "bogus" deposition. This review strongly advises others with serious worker disputes to seek legal representation elsewhere.

Considering these contrasting experiences, it is difficult to definitively characterize the services provided by Hayward Samuel G. The positive review highlights qualities such as thoroughness in initial consultation, integrity in handling the discontinuation of services, and a strong grasp of legal issues. The negative review, however, paints a picture of neglect, poor communication, and a lack of effective representation in a worker discrimination case.

Features that might have characterized Hayward Samuel G's practice, based on the mixed reviews, could include a strong initial assessment of a case (as noted in the defamation case) and a potentially sharp legal intellect. However, the negative review raises serious concerns about communication, follow-through on case work, and the overall quality of representation in certain types of cases. The discrepancy between these two accounts underscores the importance for potential clients to seek multiple sources of information and conduct thorough due diligence when selecting legal counsel.

In terms of promotional information, the positive review from the defamation case could be seen as a strong endorsement of Mr. Hayward's initial professionalism and ethical conduct. The client's surprise at the full refund and the provision of detailed case notes and a letter of endorsement speaks highly of his integrity. However, this positive portrayal is significantly countered by the negative review detailing a lack of action and communication in a worker discrimination case, which serves as a strong caution against using his services for such matters.

Given the information that Mr. Samuel G. Hayward, Sr., has passed away, any promotional value from past positive experiences is now historical. Local users searching "Lawyers Near Me" should be aware of this information and understand that the services previously offered by Mr. Hayward may no longer be available or may be provided under a significantly different structure if the practice continues under new leadership.

The stark contrast between the two client experiences serves as a critical reminder for local users utilizing "Lawyers Near Me" to thoroughly research any attorney they are considering. Relying on a single review, whether positive or negative, may not provide a complete picture. It is essential to seek multiple perspectives, inquire about the attorney's specific experience in handling cases similar to your own, and assess their communication style and commitment to client service during an initial consultation.

In conclusion, based on the provided information, Hayward Samuel G, as represented by Samuel G. Hayward, Sr., had a practice in Louisville, KY, where he handled cases involving defamation and worker discrimination. Client experiences appear to be mixed, with one client praising his thoroughness and integrity, while another reports significant issues with communication and the quality of representation. Given the reported passing of Mr. Hayward, local users in Louisville searching for legal assistance through "Lawyers Near Me" should be aware that the practice may no longer be operating under the same leadership or may have undergone significant changes. Any decision to seek legal services from this entity should be based on current information and thorough due diligence.