Jorisch Bertram

For individuals in Taiwan who require legal assistance within the United States, specifically in the New York area, Jorisch Bertram, located at 366 N Broadway # 410, Jericho, NY 11753, USA, presents a legal practice that has garnered distinctly different reactions from its clients. When selecting legal representation, it is essential to consider the spectrum of experiences reported by others. While geographically distant from Taiwan, those with legal matters in New York may find the following objective analysis of client reviews informative.

Under the platform category "Lawyers Near Me," Jorisch Bertram, despite its location outside of Taiwan, offers legal services in Jericho, New York. The available client reviews offer contrasting perspectives on the firm's environment, services, and key attributes. One review expresses significant dissatisfaction with communication, while another praises the lawyer's excellent service and proactive communication. This divergence necessitates a careful examination of both accounts to provide a balanced introduction for potential clients.

One client review recounts a very negative experience, citing "very bad communication." This individual claims that the lawyer never contacted them after a referral. They even stated that the answering service team acknowledged the lawyer's poor communication skills. For what they described as a "simple case," the client strongly recommended avoiding Jorisch Bertram, particularly for "high profile" cases, suggesting a lack of confidence in the lawyer's ability to handle complex or sensitive matters effectively. This reviewer explicitly advised others not to waste their time or money and encouraged potential clients to call the firm themselves to experience the communication issues firsthand.

In stark contrast, another client offers high praise, describing Bert as "Excellent and Smart." This reviewer highlights that Bert proactively contacts his clients weekly to remind them of court dates. Furthermore, they commend his quick return of calls and his ability to explain everything clearly, including what to expect, important points, and strategies for achieving the best possible outcome. This client found the lawyer to be "VERY HELPFUL" and expressed their gratitude.

The specific legal services offered by Jorisch Bertram are not explicitly detailed in the provided reviews. However, the mention of a "court date" in the positive review suggests that the lawyer handles litigation or court-related matters. The negative review, while not specifying the type of case, implies it was a legal matter that should have been straightforward. Without further information, it is difficult to definitively state the areas of law in which Jorisch Bertram specializes.

The features of Jorisch Bertram, as perceived by clients, are contradictory. One potential feature, based on the positive review, is proactive client communication, including weekly court date reminders and prompt call returns. Additionally, the ability to explain legal matters clearly and provide guidance on achieving the best possible outcome appears to be a strength for some clients.

However, the negative review strongly suggests a significant lack of communication, to the point where the lawyer allegedly does not initiate contact with referred clients. The acknowledgment of poor communication by the answering service further supports this concern. This inconsistency in reported communication is a critical point for potential clients to consider.

There is no explicit promotional information provided in the reviews. The positive review serves as a strong testimonial to the helpfulness and communication skills experienced by that particular client. However, the serious communication issues raised in the negative review temper this positive feedback significantly. Potential clients would need to weigh these contrasting experiences carefully.

For individuals in Taiwan seeking legal assistance in the Jericho, New York area, the feedback regarding Jorisch Bertram presents a considerable dilemma. The stark contrast between the two reviews, one praising excellent communication and the other citing a complete lack thereof, suggests a potential inconsistency in client service or communication practices within the firm. The negative review's claim that the answering service acknowledges the poor communication is particularly concerning.

Given the serious nature of the communication issues reported in one review, potential clients should exercise caution and seek further information before considering Jorisch Bertram. It would be advisable to look for additional reviews from other sources to gain a broader understanding of the firm's reputation and client service practices. Directly contacting the firm to assess their responsiveness and communication style, as suggested by the negative reviewer, might also be a prudent step.

The positive review indicates that when communication is effective, the client experiences a helpful and informative legal service. However, the negative review raises red flags about the reliability of this communication. For clients based in Taiwan, clear and consistent communication is particularly crucial due to the geographical distance and potential time zone differences. A lawyer who is unresponsive or difficult to reach could create significant stress and hinder the progress of their legal matter.

In conclusion, the introduction to Jorisch Bertram for potential clients in Taiwan with legal needs in Jericho, NY, must objectively present the conflicting client experiences. While one client praised the lawyer's excellent communication and helpfulness, another reported a complete lack of contact and acknowledged poor communication from the firm's answering service. This significant disparity necessitates careful consideration and further investigation by anyone contemplating engaging Jorisch Bertram's services to ensure their legal needs will be met with reliable and effective communication.