Kenneth Sandler

For individuals in the Philadelphia metropolitan area, including those in Southern New Jersey, who are seeking legal representation, the "Lawyers Near Me" platform aims to provide connections to local attorneys. This introduction focuses on Kenneth Sandler, an attorney with an office located in Marlton, New Jersey. While not directly in Philadelphia, Marlton is within a reasonable commuting distance for many in the Greater Philadelphia region. The available information consists solely of a single client review, which provides a crucial perspective on their experience with Mr. Sandler.

The office of Kenneth Sandler is located at 701 Westerly Dr, Marlton, NJ 08053, USA. Marlton is situated in Burlington County, New Jersey, and is part of the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington metropolitan statistical area. The environment of a professional office building in a suburban area like Marlton typically includes standard amenities for client meetings and legal work. Potential clients from the Philadelphia area considering Mr. Sandler would need to factor in the travel distance to his New Jersey office for consultations and other in-person requirements.

The sole piece of client feedback available for Kenneth Sandler is a negative one, stating, "Agreed to take my case, then ghosted me. I've tried to reach him numerous times by email and phone but to no avail." This review raises significant concerns regarding Mr. Sandler's client communication and professional conduct. The term "ghosted" implies a complete cessation of contact without explanation after seemingly agreeing to represent the client. The reviewer's attempts to reach him "numerous times by email and phone" without success further underscores a lack of responsiveness and communication. It is important to note that this is a single review and may not represent the totality of experiences with Mr. Sandler. However, it is a direct account from a potential client and should be considered carefully.

Based on this limited information, it is challenging to definitively outline the services Kenneth Sandler offers. The review indicates that he at least initially agrees to take on legal cases. However, the subsequent lack of communication leaves the specific areas of law he practices unclear. Potential clients would need to independently verify his areas of expertise, which could include real estate law, business law, personal injury, or other fields. The negative review does not provide any clues regarding his specific legal focus.

The single client review does not highlight any positive features of Kenneth Sandler's practice. Instead, it raises serious concerns about his responsiveness and communication with clients, at least in this particular instance. The act of "ghosting" a client after agreeing to take their case is a significant breach of professional conduct and can leave the client in a difficult position, potentially delaying their legal proceedings and requiring them to seek new representation. Effective communication is a fundamental aspect of the attorney-client relationship, and the lack thereof, as described in the review, is a significant negative factor to consider.

Given the nature of the available feedback, there is no positive promotional information to extract. The review serves as a cautionary note rather than a recommendation. Potential clients would need to look beyond this single review and seek additional information or references to form a more comprehensive opinion of Kenneth Sandler's practice. It would be prudent to inquire directly about his communication practices and client management procedures.

For local users in the Philadelphia area who are considering Kenneth Sandler based on the "Lawyers Near Me" platform and his proximity in Southern New Jersey, this single client review presents a significant point of caution. While location can be a factor in choosing an attorney, the ability to communicate effectively and maintain a professional relationship is paramount. This review suggests a potential risk in terms of client communication and responsiveness. Therefore, potential clients should proceed with extreme caution and conduct thorough due diligence before engaging Mr. Sandler's services.

It is strongly recommended that individuals considering Kenneth Sandler attempt to find additional reviews or seek references from other sources. Contacting the New Jersey State Bar Association or relevant local bar associations might provide further information or allow for inquiries regarding his professional standing. Directly contacting Mr. Sandler's office to inquire about his communication policies and client intake procedures would also be a prudent step. Asking for references from past clients in similar types of cases could provide a more balanced perspective.

In conclusion, the introduction of Kenneth Sandler, based on the limited information available, is marked by a significant concern raised in a client review regarding a complete lack of communication after an initial agreement to take a case. While his office is located in Marlton, NJ, within the Greater Philadelphia area, potential clients from the region should carefully consider this feedback regarding his responsiveness. Due to the serious nature of the "ghosting" allegation and the lack of any positive information, local users are strongly advised to exercise caution, conduct thorough independent research, and seek additional information or references before deciding to engage Kenneth Sandler for their legal needs. Effective communication is a cornerstone of the attorney-client relationship, and the available review raises serious questions in this regard.