Marguerite A. Maggs

For individuals in the Eatontown, New Jersey area seeking legal representation through the "Lawyers Near Me" platform, it is essential to consider a comprehensive view of attorney feedback when making a selection. This report presents a contrasting set of reviews regarding Marguerite A. Maggs, located at 1 Industrial Way West, Westridge Building B. You can contact her office at (732) 389-3800 or via mobile phone at +1 732-389-3800. It is strongly advised to review the following information carefully to form your own informed opinion.

One detailed and highly critical review describes a significantly negative experience with Marguerite A. Maggs. The former client recounts an initial "fantastic" consultation characterized by attentiveness and informative guidance. However, the experience reportedly deteriorated significantly after a $10,000 retainer was paid. The client alleges extreme difficulty in contacting Ms. Maggs, stating they had to "beg" for communication despite an hourly rate of $450.00. Scheduled phone appointments were allegedly missed without explanation, leading to considerable frustration.

Furthermore, this reviewer claims that Ms. Maggs made deals with the opposing attorney without their consent and allegedly bragged about her high volume of business. The client also describes Ms. Maggs's demeanor as "extremely condescending." Attempts to reach her after hours were reportedly futile if the call was missed, as she allegedly has no extension. The client attributes Ms. Maggs's perceived lack of professionalism to their own frustration, which they acknowledge may have led to being "short" with her staff (for which they apologized), but they assert that Ms. Maggs refused to take responsibility for her actions.

Adding a particularly concerning dimension, this review alludes to other feedback suggesting a potential bias against men, noting that Ms. Maggs's entire office staff is female. The reviewer explicitly states their opinion that she is "Bias towards women." Financially, the client reports being charged $1900.00 for allegedly only one letter written before they ultimately terminated Ms. Maggs's services.

In stark contrast to this highly negative account, another reviewer offers an overwhelmingly positive perspective. This client describes Marguerite A. Maggs as an "amazing attorney" who, along with her team, "work hard for you" and "truly cares about her clients." This positive reviewer states they have recommended Ms. Maggs to several friends, family, and acquaintances, all of whom have reportedly been "extremely happy," mirroring their own positive experience.

Given these diametrically opposed reviews, local users considering Marguerite A. Maggs for their legal needs face a complex decision. The positive review highlights dedication and genuine care for clients, leading to successful recommendations. This suggests that some clients have had very positive experiences with her and her firm.

However, the detailed negative review raises serious concerns regarding communication, professionalism, billing practices, and potential bias. The allegations of difficulty in contact after the retainer, missed appointments, unilateral agreements with opposing counsel, condescending behavior, and a significant charge for limited work are all factors that prospective clients must carefully weigh.

Without further corroborating information regarding the environment of Ms. Maggs's office, we can only infer a standard professional setting based on the address in a commercial building. The presence of an all-female staff, noted in the negative review, might be a factor for some clients to consider based on their personal preferences and the nature of their legal matter.

In terms of services, the positive review suggests expertise in an area where hard work and client care are crucial, potentially family law or a similar field where personal relationships and outcomes are paramount. The negative review does not specify the area of law but implies a situation where diligent communication and advocacy were expected but allegedly not provided.

The conflicting reviews make it challenging to present definitive features of Ms. Maggs's practice. One potential feature, based on the positive review, could be a dedicated and caring approach. However, the negative review strongly contradicts this, suggesting poor communication and a lack of client focus after the initial consultation.

Similarly, promotional information is mixed. The positive testimonial serves as a strong endorsement, suggesting effective representation and satisfied clients. Conversely, the negative review acts as a significant deterrent, warning potential clients away from her services. Therefore, it is impossible to offer a straightforward promotional overview.

Local users in Eatontown, NJ, considering Marguerite A. Maggs should recognize the existence of these strongly contrasting opinions. While one client reports an "amazing" experience and widespread satisfaction among their referrals, another details a deeply frustrating and costly encounter characterized by poor communication, alleged unethical behavior, and concerns about bias. It is crucial for prospective clients to conduct their own due diligence, potentially seeking additional references or a more in-depth consultation to determine if Ms. Maggs's services align with their individual needs and expectations. The significant disparity in these two publicly available reviews necessitates a cautious and thorough approach to making an informed decision.