Raskin Gorham Anderson Law

For individuals and businesses in the Los Angeles area seeking legal representation through platforms like "Lawyers Near Me," it is crucial to conduct thorough research and consider all available information before making a decision. Among the law firms that may appear in local search results is Raskin Gorham Anderson Law, located at 11333 Iowa Avenue in Los Angeles, California. While the platform aims to connect users with nearby legal services, it is essential to objectively evaluate any feedback or information available about the firm and its attorneys.

The physical location of Raskin Gorham Anderson Law, situated on Iowa Avenue in Los Angeles, suggests its presence within a residential and commercial area of the city. This location may offer accessibility for clients residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods. However, the environment of the office itself is not described in the provided information, and potential clients would typically assess this during a visit or initial consultation, if they choose to proceed that far.

The provided information includes serious and concerning allegations against an attorney associated with Raskin Gorham Anderson Law, named Dustin Sloan. It is important to note that these are allegations made by a former client and are presented here objectively as part of the available information. According to the reviews, Attorney Dustin Sloan is reportedly the subject of a California Bar Complaint and is named as an accomplice in an FBI criminal complaint. These allegations stem from a contract dispute involving the reviewer and a client of Mr. Sloan, namely Adam Cushman of Film 14.

The specific allegations against Attorney Dustin Sloan, as detailed in the reviews, include:

• Conspiracy to Commit Consumer Fraud: Allegedly conspiring with his client, Adam Cushman, to perpetrate an online consumer scam.
• Embezzlement: Accusations of assisting in the embezzlement of over $5,000 owed to the reviewer for breach of contract.
• Use of Deliberate Falsehood: Allegedly using a fabricated claim of defamation against the reviewer and third parties (including a YouTuber) in an attempt to suppress allegations of fraud against his client.

The reviewer explicitly states their opinion that Attorney Sloan and, by implication, Raskin Gorham Anderson Law (suggesting the practice supports his actions), are unethical and untrustworthy. The reviewer strongly advises others not to entrust this lawyer or his practice with their business and expresses hope that justice will be served.

It is critical for local users considering Raskin Gorham Anderson Law for their legal needs to be aware of these serious allegations. While every individual is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law or through a Bar Association disciplinary process, these reviews raise significant concerns about the ethical conduct of at least one attorney associated with the firm and potentially the firm's practices.

The services typically offered by a law firm can span a wide range of legal areas. Without specific information about the practice areas of Raskin Gorham Anderson Law beyond the context of the allegations (which involve a contract dispute and alleged consumer fraud), it is impossible to detail their expertise. However, potential clients would usually inquire about the firm's specialization, which could include areas such as business law, real estate law, family law, criminal defense, personal injury law, and more. Given the nature of the allegations in the reviews, it is particularly important for individuals seeking legal assistance related to business matters, contracts, or consumer rights to be aware of this information.

The features that clients typically look for in a law firm include ethical conduct, competence, experience, clear communication, and a commitment to their clients' best interests. The serious ethical concerns raised in the reviews directly contradict these expected features. While every legal professional and firm may face complaints or disputes, the nature and severity of the allegations involving potential criminal conduct and Bar complaints should give potential clients pause.

There is no promotional information available for Raskin Gorham Anderson Law in the provided text. In fact, the reviews serve as a strong warning against using the services of Attorney Dustin Sloan and potentially the entire practice. Therefore, instead of highlighting any positive features or promotions, it is imperative to emphasize the gravity of the negative feedback. The repeated nature of the negative review underscores the strength of the reviewer's negative experience and their desire to warn others.

Local users searching for "Lawyers Near Me" in Los Angeles who encounter Raskin Gorham Anderson Law should carefully consider the information presented in these reviews. It is advisable to conduct further independent research, which may include checking the California Bar Association's website for any disciplinary actions or complaints against Dustin Sloan or other attorneys at the firm. Additionally, seeking information from other sources or considering alternative legal representation in the area would be a prudent course of action. The allegations of unethical behavior and potential criminal conduct are significant and warrant thorough consideration before engaging this firm.

In conclusion, while Raskin Gorham Anderson Law is located at 11333 Iowa Avenue in Los Angeles and may appear as a local option for legal services, the provided client reviews contain extremely serious allegations of unethical conduct and involvement in potential criminal activity against Attorney Dustin Sloan, who is associated with the practice. These allegations include conspiring to commit consumer fraud, embezzlement, and the use of deliberate falsehoods. Potential clients should be aware of this information and exercise extreme caution when considering engaging the services of this firm or Attorney Dustin Sloan. Thorough due diligence and consideration of alternative legal counsel are strongly recommended. The repeated and forceful nature of the warning in the reviews cannot be ignored and should be a primary factor for any prospective clients.