Ricotta & Marks, P.C.

For the residents and businesses of Long Island City, New York, finding the right legal counsel requires careful consideration of experience, professionalism, and client satisfaction. Ricotta & Marks, P.C., situated at 30-30 Northern Blvd Suite 401 in Long Island City, operates within the "Lawyers Near Me" category, offering legal services to the local community. The available client reviews present a dichotomy of experiences, with one client expressing high satisfaction and another detailing significant dissatisfaction and unprofessionalism.

The physical environment of Ricotta & Marks, P.C., located on Northern Boulevard in Long Island City, is likely a professional office setting designed to facilitate client meetings and the handling of legal matters. Situated in Suite 401, it suggests a multi-office building, common for professional services in urban areas. While specific details about the office ambiance are not provided, one can anticipate a space equipped for legal work, including private consultation rooms and administrative areas. The Long Island City location offers accessibility for local residents and businesses seeking legal assistance in their vicinity. The office would likely have standard resources such as phones, computers, and legal document management systems.

Based on the client reviews, Ricotta & Marks, P.C. appears to handle various legal matters. The positive review specifically mentions working with Thomas Ricotta, implying he handles cases where responsiveness and clear communication are valued. The negative review, however, pertains to the actions of both Matthew Marks and Thomas Ricotta, suggesting they both are practicing attorneys at the firm and handle litigation-related matters, at least in the case described. Therefore, the potential services offered by Ricotta & Marks, P.C. may include:

• General Legal Representation: The positive review suggests representation where client communication and support are key.
• Litigation: The negative review explicitly details issues within a litigation context, including depositions and case management. This indicates that the firm handles litigation matters.
• Other Potential Areas: Without more specific information, it is difficult to ascertain other areas of law they might practice. It is common for firms to handle a range of issues such as real estate, business law, or estate planning, but this cannot be confirmed based solely on the provided reviews. Interested parties should inquire directly about their specific legal needs.

The features of Ricotta & Marks, P.C., as portrayed by the contrasting client reviews, offer a nuanced perspective:

• Positive Aspects (Based on one review regarding Thomas Ricotta):
  • Responsiveness: Thomas Ricotta is described as "incredibly responsive" from the beginning to the end of the legal process.
  • Informed Communication: The client felt "well-informed throughout the whole process," indicating proactive communication from the attorney.
  • Clarity in Explanation: Thomas Ricotta ensured everything was explained clearly to the client.
  • Supportive Assistance: The client felt Thomas Ricotta was always available to help.
  • Reliability: The client explicitly recommends his services for "reliable and supportive legal assistance."
• Negative Aspects (Based on one review regarding Matthew Marks and Thomas Ricotta):
  • Negligence: The firm is accused of "significant negligence" in handling the client's case.
  • Lack of Professionalism: The overall experience is described as "disappointing and unprofessional."
  • Dishonesty/Failure to Honor Commitments: Specific allegations include Matthew Marks stating a deposition would occur, which allegedly never happened.
  • Evasiveness and Lack of Transparency: Repeated attempts to follow up were met with "vague and unhelpful responses."
  • Harm to the Case and Unnecessary Stress: The firm's actions allegedly led to complications and stress for the client.
  • Formal Complaints Filed: The client has filed formal complaints with the grievance committee, seeking accountability and potential disciplinary action.
  • Strong Negative Recommendation: The client strongly advises against hiring Matthew Marks and Thomas Ricotta for any legal matters, citing "dishonesty, negligence, and lack of professionalism."

The promotional information for Ricotta & Marks, P.C. is significantly impacted by the starkly different client experiences:

• Potential Positive Promotion (Based on one review): The positive testimonial for Thomas Ricotta could attract clients seeking responsive, communicative, reliable, and supportive legal assistance. It highlights positive aspects of client interaction and service delivery.
• Strong Negative Promotion (Based on another review): The detailed and serious allegations of negligence, dishonesty, and unprofessionalism against both Matthew Marks and Thomas Ricotta serve as a strong deterrent for potential clients. The fact that a formal complaint has been filed could further raise concerns.

For local users in Long Island City seeking legal representation and considering Ricotta & Marks, P.C., the contrasting reviews present a critical point for consideration. The positive review suggests that at least one of the attorneys, Thomas Ricotta, is capable of providing satisfactory service characterized by good communication and support. However, the negative review, detailing serious allegations of negligence and unprofessional conduct involving both attorneys, cannot be dismissed lightly. The specific claim of a promised deposition not occurring and the subsequent evasiveness raises significant concerns about the firm's reliability and client communication in certain cases.

The fact that the dissatisfied client has filed formal complaints with the grievance committee indicates the seriousness of their allegations and their pursuit of accountability. This action could have implications for the attorneys' professional standing. Potential clients should be aware of these publicly stated concerns when considering engaging Ricotta & Marks, P.C.

Given this divided feedback, local users in the "Lawyers Near Me" category should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence if considering Ricotta & Marks, P.C. It would be advisable to seek additional reviews or references from other clients, if available, and to ask detailed questions about the firm's practices, communication protocols, and specific experience in the relevant area of law during any initial consultation. Understanding which attorney would be handling their case and inquiring about their individual track record and client satisfaction could also be beneficial. The significant discrepancy in client experiences underscores the importance of looking beyond a single positive review and considering all available information, especially serious negative allegations.

In conclusion, Ricotta & Marks, P.C. in Long Island City has received both positive feedback regarding the responsiveness and supportiveness of Thomas Ricotta and a serious negative review alleging negligence, dishonesty, and unprofessionalism against both Thomas Ricotta and Matthew Marks. Local users seeking legal services should carefully consider these contrasting experiences and conduct thorough due diligence before making a decision about engaging this firm.