Ross, David K

For individuals in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and the surrounding areas seeking legal professionals listed under the "Lawyers Near Me" category, David K. Ross operates from an office located at 6300 Shingle Creek Pkwy #305. He can be contacted by phone at (763) 561-2800 or via mobile at +1 763-561-2800. This local presence offers a point of contact for those seeking legal services in the Minneapolis area.

The available information regarding David K. Ross primarily stems from customer reviews, which offer insights into his professional conduct and interactions. It is important to note that these reviews present subjective experiences and perspectives. One reviewer states that while they have never hired Mr. Ross, they find it "difficult to assess" his capability as a lawyer but express concern regarding his "utter lack of compassion for people and respect for personal freedoms." This initial feedback raises questions about his approach and demeanor in his professional role.

Another review provides more specific details, identifying David Kelland Ross as an attorney in Brooklyn Park who has been "responsible for prosecuting a number of community members exercising their right to peacefully assemble." The reviewer expresses a negative sentiment towards this aspect of his work, particularly noting the prosecution of "young students with no prior criminal record." This perspective contrasts with the reviewer's generally positive experiences with legal professionals, suggesting that their interaction with Mr. Ross has significantly altered their perception. The reviewer further mentions a policy, purportedly instructed by Mr. Ross to his paralegal, Becky Gaffer, that restricts direct communication (speaking or emailing) with him to those who are paying him or another lawyer. This administrative practice is presented as contributing to an impression of an "unfeeling, money-hungry lawyer," a trope the reviewer had previously not subscribed to.

The third review explicitly recommends that individuals seeking a lawyer "who is not concerned with doing what’s right" should consider hiring David Kelland Ross, suggesting that they believe his priorities may not align with principles of justice or ethical conduct. This strongly negative recommendation is based on the reviewer's interpretation of Mr. Ross's professional actions and priorities.

Based on the available review information, the environment surrounding David K. Ross's practice, at least from the perspective of these reviewers, appears to be one that is perceived as lacking in compassion and prioritizing financial gain over other considerations. The policy regarding communication suggests a potentially restrictive and impersonal approach to interacting with individuals who are not clients. These perceptions, while subjective, offer a glimpse into how some members of the community view his professional environment.

The services provided by David K. Ross, based on the reviews, appear to be primarily focused on prosecution within the Brooklyn Park area. Prosecution involves representing the state or government in legal proceedings against individuals accused of crimes. This role inherently involves advocating for the enforcement of laws and seeking legal sanctions against defendants. The reviews highlight his involvement in prosecuting individuals involved in peaceful assembly, including young individuals with no prior criminal records. While the specific types of cases he handles are not detailed beyond this, his primary function, according to these reviews, is that of a prosecutor.

Features that emerge from the reviews include a perceived lack of compassion and respect for personal freedoms (as stated by one reviewer who has not hired him), a focus on prosecuting community members exercising their right to peaceful assembly, a communication policy that restricts direct contact to paying clients, and an overall impression of prioritizing financial gain over what is perceived as "doing what’s right." These features are presented as negative attributes by the reviewers and should be considered as subjective interpretations of his professional conduct.

Promotional information is not explicitly provided in the given data. The reviews themselves, while overwhelmingly negative, serve as a form of public commentary on his professional activities. In the absence of any positive promotional material or a website description, individuals seeking legal services would need to rely on such publicly available opinions and potentially seek additional information from other sources or directly contact his office to form their own assessment.

As a lawyer located in Minneapolis and serving areas like Brooklyn Park, David K. Ross is part of the local legal ecosystem. His role as a prosecutor means he operates within the framework of the local judicial system, interacting with law enforcement, the courts, and the community. The negative reviews suggest that his actions in this role have drawn criticism from some community members, particularly regarding the prosecution of peaceful assembly and the perceived lack of compassion in his approach.

In conclusion, David K. Ross is a lawyer located in Minneapolis with an office at 6300 Shingle Creek Pkwy #305. He can be reached at (763) 561-2800. The available information consists solely of negative customer reviews. These reviews describe him as potentially lacking compassion and respect for personal freedoms, heavily involved in prosecuting community members engaged in peaceful assembly (including young individuals with no prior criminal records), and operating under a communication policy that restricts direct contact to paying clients. The overall sentiment expressed in the reviews is highly critical, suggesting a perception of prioritizing financial gain over ethical considerations. Individuals seeking legal counsel in the Minneapolis area are strongly advised to consider these perspectives and conduct thorough due diligence before engaging the services of David K. Ross. Given the nature of the feedback, it is crucial to seek a comprehensive understanding of his professional background and approach from various sources beyond these singular, negative accounts.