Schioppi Joseph C

When searching for legal representation through platforms like "Lawyers Near Me," it is crucial for local users to have access to a comprehensive and unbiased view of potential legal counsel. This introduction aims to provide an objective overview of Schioppi Joseph C, located at 123-35 82nd Rd, Kew Gardens, NY 11415, USA, based on the available customer reviews. It is important to note that the following information is derived solely from the provided testimonials and does not represent an independent investigation into the claims made.

Information regarding the specific environment of Schioppi Joseph C's office is not detailed in the provided reviews. However, its physical address in Kew Gardens suggests a local presence within the community, potentially offering in-person consultations for clients in the area. The accessibility and professionalism of the office environment would typically be factors for individuals seeking legal services.

Details regarding the specific legal services offered by Schioppi Joseph C are not explicitly listed in the provided information. Typically, a law practice handles various legal matters based on their specialization and the needs of their clientele. Without further information, it is difficult to ascertain the specific areas of law in which Schioppi Joseph C practices. However, the negative reviews provide some context, with one review mentioning a case involving a nephew, suggesting potential involvement in areas such as criminal defense or family law, although this is speculative.

The limited information available primarily consists of two negative customer reviews, which raise significant concerns about the features and professionalism of Schioppi Joseph C's services. These reviews highlight the following issues:

• Lack of Action and Negative Outcomes: One reviewer stated that after paying a substantial fee of ten thousand dollars, the lawyer "did absolutely nothing" and allegedly made the situation worse for their nephew's case. This included an alleged failure to appear in court and accusations against the client for non-appearance. The reviewer further claimed that their nephew was pressured into accepting false charges, leading to a prison sentence, and described hiring this lawyer as "the worst decision" they made. They also indicated considering legal action against the lawyer.
• Unprofessional and Insensitive Conduct by Staff: Another review details a distressing experience when calling the office for representation regarding a child who was molested. The reviewer alleges that the woman who answered the call, speaking in Spanish, blamed the child for not speaking up sooner and criticized the parents for a lack of awareness. The reviewer expressed outrage at this insensitive and cruel response, emphasizing that the staff member was unaware of the family's situation and their pursuit of justice. The reviewer concluded by stating that while declining the case would have been acceptable, blaming the victim was not and deemed the conduct shameful.

Given the serious nature of these allegations, it is challenging to identify positive features based solely on this information. The reviews paint a picture of significant client dissatisfaction and raise questions about the level of professional conduct and effectiveness of the legal services provided.

Currently, there is no promotional information available for Schioppi Joseph C in the provided text. Typically, lawyers might offer free initial consultations or highlight specific areas of expertise to attract clients. However, in this case, the overwhelmingly negative feedback overshadows any potential promotional aspects that might otherwise be considered.

For local users browsing "Lawyers Near Me," it is essential to carefully consider all available feedback when making a decision about legal representation. The two provided reviews for Schioppi Joseph C raise significant red flags regarding both the handling of a specific legal case and the professionalism of the office staff. These accounts suggest potential issues with communication, diligence, and client sensitivity.

It is important to remember that these reviews represent individual experiences and may not be representative of every client's interaction with Schioppi Joseph C. However, the severity of the allegations, including claims of inaction, negative case outcomes, and insensitive victim-blaming, warrant serious consideration for anyone contemplating engaging this legal professional.

Prospective clients are strongly advised to conduct thorough due diligence before making a decision. This could include seeking additional reviews from other sources, if available, and potentially consulting with other legal professionals to get a broader perspective. Directly contacting Schioppi Joseph C's office to understand their perspective on these reviews might also be a step some individuals choose to take. However, the information currently available paints a concerning picture.

In conclusion, based on the provided customer reviews, there are significant concerns regarding the services and professionalism associated with Schioppi Joseph C. The allegations include a lack of effective legal action leading to a negative outcome for a client, as well as highly insensitive and unprofessional conduct by a staff member when dealing with a sensitive case involving a child victim. Local users seeking legal representation in the Kew Gardens area should carefully consider this information and conduct thorough research before making a decision.