Lawyers Near MeCaliforniaSanta Clara CountySan JoseCastlemontSouth Winchester Boulevard
1361 S Winchester Blvd, San Jose, CA 95117, USA
Mrs. SCHLEPPHORST HAS REPRESENTED ME AS A MINOR AND ALSO AS AN ADULT. SHE IS A WONDERFUL ATTORNEY AND HER STAFF IS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND KIND. THE OTHER REVIEWS ARE LIKELY COMING FROM PEOPLE THAT WERE UNABLE TO SWAY THE SYSTEM. I HAVE BEEN VERY BLESSED AS A CHILD AS WELL AS NOW AS A PARENT. SHE WAS NEVER UNFAIR WITH MY CHILDS FATHER. HE MADE HIS CHOICE NOT TO FOLLOW THE COURT ORDER AND THAT WAS WHEN IT WENT SOUTH. JUDGES DECISION NOT THE ATTORNEYS.
When searching for legal representation within the "Lawyers Near Me" platform category in San Jose, it is essential to carefully consider all available information to make an informed decision. Schlepphorst Kathyrn is an attorney located at 1361 S Winchester Blvd, San Jose, CA 95117, USA. She can be reached at phone number (408) 993-1120 or mobile phone +1 408-993-1120.
The limited information available online provides a mixed perspective on the services offered by Schlepphorst Kathyrn. One reviewer shares a positive experience, stating that Mrs. Schlepphorst represented them both as a minor and as an adult. This client describes her as a "wonderful attorney" and praises her staff as "knowledgeable and kind." They also suggest that negative reviews may originate from individuals who were unsuccessful in legal proceedings, emphasizing that court decisions are made by judges, not solely by attorneys. This positive account highlights her potential effectiveness in representing clients, particularly in family law matters, as the reviewer mentions representation as a minor and in relation to their child's father.
However, other feedback presents a contrasting view. Another reviewer explicitly states their agreement with "the other two reviewers" and describes her as "the worst." This strongly negative sentiment raises concerns about potential issues with her legal services or client interactions. It is important to acknowledge these critical opinions when evaluating her suitability as a legal representative.
Adding another layer of complexity is a quote attributed to a recent article that casts serious allegations against Attorney Kathryn Schlepphorst. According to this quote, she is described as "the biggest asset for the criminal enterprise operating in the county’s local courts." The article further alleges that she "whispers in the ears of judges, keeps watch over referrals of cases, and looks for leaks that could expose the outright racketering that has harmed countless California families with the full knowledge of the state’s most powerful lawyers and judges." These are severe accusations that, if substantiated, would indicate significant ethical and professional misconduct. It is crucial for potential clients to be aware of these allegations, which raise serious questions about her professional integrity and conduct within the legal system.
Given the starkly contrasting feedback, it is challenging to provide a definitive assessment of the environment and services offered by Schlepphorst Kathyrn. The positive review suggests a supportive office environment with a knowledgeable and kind staff, at least in that individual's experience. However, the strongly negative review and the serious allegations from the quoted article paint a potentially very different picture. Without further information or corroboration, it is difficult to ascertain the typical client experience or the overall professionalism of her practice.
Similarly, the specific legal services provided by Schlepphorst Kathyrn are not explicitly detailed. The positive review mentions representation in matters related to a child and their father, suggesting experience in family law. However, the allegations in the quoted article imply involvement in potentially illicit activities within the court system, which would be a severe breach of professional ethics rather than a legitimate legal service. Potential clients would need to independently verify her areas of specialization and ensure they align with their specific legal needs.
In terms of features, the positive review highlights her as a "wonderful attorney" and her staff as "knowledgeable and kind." This suggests potential strengths in client communication and support. However, the negative reviews and the serious allegations point to potential significant drawbacks, including alleged unethical conduct and poor client experiences. It is impossible to identify reliable positive features without further objective information.
There is no promotional information available in the provided text. Therefore, it is not possible to comment on any specific aspects of her practice that are advertised to attract new clients.
In conclusion, the available information on Schlepphorst Kathyrn presents a highly contradictory picture. While one client offers a positive testimonial regarding her representation in family law matters, others express strong dissatisfaction. Furthermore, serious allegations from a quoted article raise significant ethical concerns. Local users searching for a lawyer on the "Lawyers Near Me" platform should carefully consider this mixed information and conduct thorough due diligence before deciding to engage her services. It would be prudent to seek additional information from independent sources, such as the State Bar of California, and potentially consult with other attorneys to make a well-informed decision about legal representation.
Potential clients should weigh the positive feedback against the negative reviews and the serious allegations. It is crucial to choose a lawyer who not only possesses the necessary legal expertise but also adheres to the highest ethical standards and maintains a professional reputation. The significant discrepancies in the available information regarding Schlepphorst Kathyrn warrant careful consideration and further investigation before entrusting her with your legal matters.
It is recommended that individuals seeking legal representation in San Jose explore other options within the "Lawyers Near Me" platform and prioritize attorneys with consistently positive reviews and a clear record of professional conduct. Engaging a lawyer is a critical decision that should be made with thorough research and careful consideration of all available information.
1361 S Winchester Blvd, San Jose, CA 95117, USA
Get directionsMrs. SCHLEPPHORST HAS REPRESENTED ME AS A MINOR AND ALSO AS AN ADULT. SHE IS A WONDERFUL ATTORNEY AND HER STAFF IS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND KIND. THE OTHER REVIEWS ARE LIKELY COMING FROM PEOPLE THAT WERE UNABLE TO SWAY THE SYSTEM. I HAVE BEEN VERY BLESSED AS A CHILD AS WELL AS NOW AS A PARENT. SHE WAS NEVER UNFAIR WITH MY CHILDS FATHER. HE MADE HIS CHOICE NOT TO FOLLOW THE COURT ORDER AND THAT WAS WHEN IT WENT SOUTH. JUDGES DECISION NOT THE ATTORNEYS.
Mar 24, 2025 · Vanessa OttI agree with the other two reviewers. She is the worst. A quote from a recent article… “ Attorney Kathryn Schlepphorst , Emede’s former law partner, continues to act as the biggest asset for the criminal enterprise operating in the county’s local courts. She whispers in the ears of judges, keeps watch over referrals of cases, and looks for leaks that could expose the outright racketering that has harmed countless California families with the full knowledge of the state’s most powerful lawyers and judges.”
Sep 27, 2023 · Kelly OsborneWe should have listened to our expert witness Dr. Leslie Drozd with respect to selection of Minor's Counsel. More often than not, Ms. Schlepphorst and her colleagues blindly favor Mother's interests over Father's. The practice billed as many as 6 staff against our account while we never saw any more than one or two. Given her husband's money from Tivo, you might expect Ms. Schlepphorst to remain in the game for a more altruistic cause but that is not the case. Our daughter's therapist also confirmed that this law firm is biased. Dad's are advised to stay well clear of this firm. I doubt there are any Dads willing post a positive review of this practice after having them involved in their custody dispute. When Mother stopped paying her attorney to attend custody hearings, Minors counsel represented mothers interests. She's ethically challenged.
Feb 12, 2020 · Eric MindenI would give zero stars if I could. I have had the same experience as the previous reviewer. She is clearly blind and enabling parental alienation. She does not care about the best interest of the child, she cares about the best interest for her business. Trying to stay busy and keeping clientele. I am sad for all of the other children who are being misrepresented by her.
Jan 19, 2021 · JAMARR VALDIVIA1361 S Winchester Blvd #113, San Jose, CA 95128, USA
1361 S Winchester Blvd STE 210, San Jose, CA 95128, USA
1245 S Winchester Blvd Suite 102, San Jose, CA 95128, USA
1101 S Winchester Blvd Suite I-208, San Jose, CA 95128, USA
651 W Hamilton Ave Suite 1000, Campbell, CA 95008, USA
51 E Campbell Ave #106c, Campbell, CA 95008, USA