Victor Marshall Law Office

For individuals in Riverside, California, seeking legal representation, the "Lawyers Near Me" platform aims to provide a comprehensive look at various legal professionals. Today, we turn our attention to Victor Marshall Law Office, located at 3900 Market St #230, Riverside, CA 92501, USA. The firm can be reached by phone at (951) 275-5291 or via mobile at +1 951-275-5291. As a part of our objective introduction, we will examine the available information, including direct client feedback, to provide local users with a clear understanding of what to expect.

Victor Marshall is a lawyer with a background that includes graduating from Thurgood Marshall School of Law and over 30 years of trial experience, reportedly handling more than 100 jury trials. He has been recognized as a lecturer in civil and criminal law forums and has received awards for community service, including the Wiley Manuel Award and the Riverside Police Association Support Award. His experience extends to serving as a professor at institutions like Platt College, Loma Linda University, and Southern California College of Law. He has also contributed articles to legal magazines and has been listed as one of California's Top Lawyers. Currently, he is an instructor for the Gerry Spence Method in Wyoming. Based on external information, his practice areas include personal injury and criminal defense.

However, when evaluating a legal professional, client experiences are a crucial component. The feedback received from clients regarding Victor Marshall Law Office presents a significant area for consideration. Several reviews express serious concerns about the firm's conduct and client interactions. These highly critical accounts detail experiences that starkly contrast with the professional expectations clients typically have of their legal representation.

One client recounted an incident where their brother, due to illness, was unable to attend a court date. Despite leaving numerous messages days in advance, they were reportedly informed by the court reporter that Victor Marshall stated he was never contacted by them. This experience led the client to strongly advise against trusting the attorney, stating, "Do not put your trust into this man."

Another client, whose disabled brother was assigned to Victor Marshall for a felony case, expressed profound dissatisfaction. They described the assignment as a "misfortune" and referred to the attorney as a "joke." This client detailed several deeply troubling interactions:

• The attorney allegedly began a conversation with a "tasteless joke" about being an attorney longer than the client's brother had been alive, despite being asked to stop making references to the brother's "short lived and nearly over life."
• More critically, the client stated that Mr. Marshall "told my brother point blank that he did not believe that he was disabled. Did not believe that my brother has optic cancer." This is presented as a shocking and highly insensitive remark.
• The review further alleges that in eight weeks as the appointed attorney, Mr. Marshall "did not bother to contact the head of the neurological department at Olive View Hospital to confirm the prognosis, prior to spotting off at the mouth." The attorney reportedly "simply decided that a 28 year old could not possibly be disabled, must be lying to get off." The client conveyed the disgust and disbelief at their disabled brother being called a liar for having an incurable disease, labeling the attorney a "scum bag" who "should attend ethics classes."
• A specific incident of alleged unprofessionalism mentioned is that Victor Marshall "hung up on my brother when my brother let him know that he will be invoking his Federal right to record all his conversations." The client concluded by reiterating that Victor Marshall is a "liar and a shady character" who "should be punished for his mistreatment of disabled individuals." The client also stated an intention to review the attorney on Google, Avvo, and file a formal complaint with the state bar for client mistreatment.

These detailed accounts from clients suggest a significant disconnect between the expected standards of legal professionalism and the experiences reported. Issues such as alleged lack of communication, insensitivity towards a client's health condition, skepticism about a client's disability, and reported unprofessional conduct during client interactions (like hanging up the phone), raise serious questions about the client service and ethical considerations of the practice.

For potential clients seeking legal services through "Lawyers Near Me," these direct and critical testimonials are paramount to consider. While an attorney's experience and stated expertise are important, the manner in which they interact with clients, their commitment to understanding client circumstances, and their adherence to ethical standards are equally, if not more, vital. The physical environment of the office, located at 3900 Market St #230, Riverside, CA 92501, USA, would typically be a factor in a client's experience, but the critical nature of the online reviews shifts the focus to the interpersonal and professional conduct of the attorney rather than the physical space itself. The services offered, as per public information, include personal injury and criminal defense, indicating a focus on these areas of law. However, the promotional information available is heavily overshadowed by the negative client feedback, which highlights alleged deficiencies in fundamental aspects of legal representation and client care.

In summary, while Victor Marshall Law Office has a listed address and contact information, and attorney Victor Marshall possesses significant experience in the legal field, the extremely negative client reviews provided warrant careful consideration by any individual contemplating legal services from this firm. These reviews point to alleged issues in client communication, professional demeanor, and respect for client circumstances, which are critical elements of effective and ethical legal representation. It is always advisable for prospective clients to conduct thorough due diligence, including researching available public reviews and, if possible, seeking direct consultations, before retaining legal counsel.