Diciurcio John

For individuals in Cherry Hill Township, New Jersey, and the surrounding areas seeking legal representation and searching within the "Lawyers Near Me" category, Diciurcio John operates a legal practice located at 900 Kings Hwy N # 310, Cherry Hill Township, NJ 08034. This office provides legal services to the local community. However, based on publicly available online reviews, potential clients should approach with caution and consider the diverse range of experiences reported by previous individuals who have engaged the services of this legal professional and his firm.

While specific details regarding the environment of the law office are not provided, it is typical for legal practices to maintain a professional setting for client consultations and case preparation. The focus for those seeking legal counsel would likely be on the services offered and the quality of representation provided. In the case of Diciurcio John, the services appear to encompass legal representation in various matters. One positive review mentions "zealous and dedicated" representation, suggesting a commitment to advocating for clients' interests. This positive feedback also specifically acknowledges the helpfulness of Donna Bryant, presumably a staff member at the office.

However, a significant portion of the publicly available reviews present a contrasting perspective. One detailed account from a former client describes a negative experience involving a charge of unlawful possession of a handgun. According to this review, the client, an out-of-state resident at the time, paid the firm an upfront fee to handle the case. The client alleges that the attorney initially assured them the situation was a common mistake. However, the review further states that a different attorney, William Di Ciurcio (identified as John's brother in the review), appeared for the first court appearance and seemed unfamiliar with the case. Subsequently, when the client was unable to attend a court date due to their out-of-state residency, they claim that William Di Ciurcio was supposed to request a continuance but allegedly failed to appear. The review further asserts that the client faced difficulties in contacting the firm to ascertain the new court date and was eventually informed that a warrant had likely been issued for their arrest. This individual ultimately had to hire another attorney to resolve the warrant and the underlying legal matter, which was reportedly settled in early 2011. The review also mentions unsuccessful attempts to contact the firm for a partial refund of the initial fee.

In a follow-up to this initial negative review, the same individual disputed a statement made on a legal platform by Diciurcio John. The client reiterated their account, acknowledging their mistake in bringing a firearm into New Jersey without understanding the state's permit laws. However, they strongly criticized the firm's handling of their case, alleging that after accepting the case and the upfront payment, the firm assigned the matter to William Di Ciurcio, who then allegedly failed to appear in court to request a continuance due to the client's inability to travel from out of state. The client expressed the view that if the firm was unable to handle the case appropriately, they should have declined it from the outset rather than leaving the client in a precarious legal situation. This detailed negative account raises significant concerns regarding case management, communication, and the level of representation provided in at least one instance.

Considering these publicly available reviews, it is challenging to definitively outline the "features" of Diciurcio John's legal practice. While one review praises "zealous and dedicated" representation, the detailed negative account paints a picture of inadequate case handling, poor communication, and potential negligence. This discrepancy suggests that the quality of service and client experience may vary significantly. Potential clients would need to weigh these contrasting perspectives carefully.

Regarding promotional information, none is explicitly provided in the given data. Therefore, it is not possible to objectively comment on any specific promotions or unique selling points advertised by Diciurcio John or his firm. The online reviews, both positive and negative, serve as a form of indirect feedback that potential clients may consider as part of their decision-making process.

Given the serious nature of the allegations in the negative review, local users searching for "Lawyers Near Me" and considering Diciurcio John should exercise due diligence. It would be prudent to seek additional information, perhaps through other online platforms or by directly contacting the law office to discuss their specific legal needs and inquire about the firm's practices and procedures. It may also be beneficial to seek consultations with multiple attorneys in the area to compare their experience, fees, and client testimonials before making a final decision.

The positive review, while brief, does indicate that at least one client experienced satisfactory representation. This highlights the possibility of varying experiences with the firm. However, the detailed and concerning nature of the negative review, particularly the allegations of mishandled court appearances and lack of communication leading to a warrant, warrants careful consideration.

In conclusion, Diciurcio John, operating under the "Lawyers Near Me" category in Cherry Hill Township, NJ, offers legal services. While one client review praises his "zealous and dedicated" representation and the helpfulness of staff, another provides a detailed account of alleged significant issues with case handling, communication, and representation in a criminal matter. Potential local users should be aware of these contrasting experiences and conduct thorough research and due diligence before engaging the services of Diciurcio John and his firm. The lack of specific promotional information further underscores the importance of relying on available client feedback and direct inquiries to assess the suitability of this legal practice for individual needs.