Lawyers Near MeMinnesotaHennepin CountyMinneapolisCentral MinneapolisHennepin Avenue
800 Hennepin Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55403, USA
I just witnessed Mr. Madel in action and it was awesome. I observed from the packed gallery. Mr. Madel argued in front of the Honorable Judge Wahl in Hennepin County Court. If I'm not mistaken, it was/is a landmark first-amendment case, because this is the first case to be litigated under the new UPEPA in Minnesota. Mr. Madel and his team were defending their client against allegations of defamation. Mr. Madel argued in favor of a motion for expedited dismissal with prejudice under the UPEPA. This motion for expedited dismissal was difficult to present, in part because the plaintiff's tactic had been to stonewall, or so it appeared to me. Mr. Madel had to "shadow box," as he aptly put it. Mr. Madel left no stone unturned. Mr. Madel anticipated and argued every possible angle, with 40 citations of caselaw for one of the pivotal issues. Mr. Madel and his team were ultra prepared. Mr. Madel paired all of his verbal remarks with visuals of data, graphs, diagrams, and bullet points. He spoke with conviction. Cogent, concise, and very compelling. Mr. Madel was so effective, that the plaintiff's attorney couldn't dispute Mr. Madel--she tried to dismiss his sound legal arguments as "fancy jargon." Mr. Madel later responded that the words which she called "fancy jargon" are taken from the text of the law. Then it was the plaintiff's attorneys who spoke. While they were speaking mostly word salad through choked and trembling voices with no visuals, Mr. Madel was seated and worked at his laptop. Sure enough, when Mr. Madel gave his extemporaneous rebuttal, he had more visuals to pair with his verbal rebuttal--visuals which he had just prepared seconds prior while listening to the plaintiff's attorneys. Visuals are impactful, because seeing is believing. When challenged by the judge, Mr. Madel pulled case law out of his head with fluidity and ease. Then Mr. Madel deftly used the opposing attorney's faulty reasoning to further his client's cause. It was so fun to watch. On top of that, it was readily apparent that the judge holds Mr. Madel in the highest regard. How many lawyers can tell a judge that the judge was wrong on something in the past and have the judge respond with a smile? They had great banter. Btw, much respect to this judge who challenged Mr. Madel at every turn. I think I witnessed Mr. Madel's flow state. At certain moments, it was really hard not to cheer. It'll be up to 60 days before we know the judge's decision. The judge may perhaps be reluctant to set precedent under UPEPA. No matter the outcome, if I ever need legal representation, I'm calling Mr. Madel's firm.
When searching for "Lawyers Near Me" in Minneapolis, individuals and businesses seek legal representation that is not only knowledgeable but also effective and dedicated to their clients' best interests. Madel Christopher, an attorney with an office located at 800 Hennepin Ave in Minneapolis, has garnered significant attention and positive reviews for his exceptional legal acumen and courtroom presence. While specific details about the physical environment of his office are not provided, its location in a well-known area of Minneapolis suggests accessibility for clients seeking legal counsel.
Based on the compelling accounts from individuals who have witnessed Mr. Madel in action, his services appear to be primarily focused on complex civil litigation, with notable expertise in First Amendment law and defamation cases. The detailed observations from a gallery attendee during a hearing in Hennepin County Court highlight Mr. Madel's proficiency in arguing intricate legal matters. This particular case was identified as a landmark First Amendment case, being the first to be litigated under the new Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA) in Minnesota. Mr. Madel was representing a client against allegations of defamation, advocating for an expedited dismissal with prejudice under this novel legal framework.
The description of Mr. Madel's courtroom performance reveals several key aspects of his legal services and features:
While the primary focus of the detailed review is on Mr. Madel's courtroom abilities in a specific First Amendment defamation case, a subsequent brief comment praising his "absolutely outstanding work holding District Attorney Moriarty accountable for her shameful and unethical prosecution of Officer Londregran" suggests that his expertise may extend to other areas of complex and potentially high-profile legal matters. This implies a capacity to handle cases involving accountability and ethical considerations, although the specifics of this case are not detailed.
Based on the available information, there is no explicit promotional information for Madel Christopher or his firm. However, the detailed and highly positive review serves as a powerful, albeit unsolicited, endorsement of his legal skills and courtroom effectiveness. For local users searching for a lawyer who is described as "awesome," "ultra prepared," "cogent, concise, and very compelling," Madel Christopher's name stands out. The reviewer's statement, "if I ever need legal representation, I'm calling Mr. Madel's firm," is a strong testament to the impression he made.
The environment of Mr. Madel's practice can be inferred to be one that values thorough preparation, strategic thinking, and effective communication. His ability to leverage technology through the use of visuals suggests a modern and dynamic approach to legal representation. Clients can likely expect a legal team that is detail-oriented, well-versed in relevant case law, and capable of presenting complex legal arguments in a clear and persuasive manner.
For individuals or businesses in Minneapolis facing First Amendment issues, defamation claims, or other complex civil litigation, Madel Christopher appears to be a highly capable and impressive legal advocate. The detailed account of his courtroom performance provides compelling evidence of his skills in legal argumentation, case preparation, and strategic thinking. While the full scope of his practice areas is not exhaustively listed, his demonstrated expertise in a landmark First Amendment case and the subsequent praise for his work in another significant matter suggest a capacity to handle challenging legal situations with proficiency and dedication.
If you are seeking a "Lawyer Near Me" in Minneapolis who has been described as "absolutely outstanding" and someone who operates with a clear command of the law and persuasive courtroom techniques, contacting Madel Christopher at 800 Hennepin Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55403, with the phone number (612) 605-0630 or +1 612-605-0630, may be a prudent step. The firsthand account of his legal prowess provides a strong indication of the level of representation you might expect.
In conclusion, Madel Christopher is presented as a highly skilled and effective lawyer based in Minneapolis, with notable expertise in First Amendment and defamation law, as evidenced by a detailed observation of his courtroom performance. His meticulous preparation, compelling presentation skills, and strategic legal thinking, coupled with positive feedback regarding his abilities, make him a noteworthy option for individuals and businesses seeking strong legal representation in complex civil litigation matters.
800 Hennepin Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55403, USA
Get directionsI just witnessed Mr. Madel in action and it was awesome. I observed from the packed gallery. Mr. Madel argued in front of the Honorable Judge Wahl in Hennepin County Court. If I'm not mistaken, it was/is a landmark first-amendment case, because this is the first case to be litigated under the new UPEPA in Minnesota. Mr. Madel and his team were defending their client against allegations of defamation. Mr. Madel argued in favor of a motion for expedited dismissal with prejudice under the UPEPA. This motion for expedited dismissal was difficult to present, in part because the plaintiff's tactic had been to stonewall, or so it appeared to me. Mr. Madel had to "shadow box," as he aptly put it. Mr. Madel left no stone unturned. Mr. Madel anticipated and argued every possible angle, with 40 citations of caselaw for one of the pivotal issues. Mr. Madel and his team were ultra prepared. Mr. Madel paired all of his verbal remarks with visuals of data, graphs, diagrams, and bullet points. He spoke with conviction. Cogent, concise, and very compelling. Mr. Madel was so effective, that the plaintiff's attorney couldn't dispute Mr. Madel--she tried to dismiss his sound legal arguments as "fancy jargon." Mr. Madel later responded that the words which she called "fancy jargon" are taken from the text of the law. Then it was the plaintiff's attorneys who spoke. While they were speaking mostly word salad through choked and trembling voices with no visuals, Mr. Madel was seated and worked at his laptop. Sure enough, when Mr. Madel gave his extemporaneous rebuttal, he had more visuals to pair with his verbal rebuttal--visuals which he had just prepared seconds prior while listening to the plaintiff's attorneys. Visuals are impactful, because seeing is believing. When challenged by the judge, Mr. Madel pulled case law out of his head with fluidity and ease. Then Mr. Madel deftly used the opposing attorney's faulty reasoning to further his client's cause. It was so fun to watch. On top of that, it was readily apparent that the judge holds Mr. Madel in the highest regard. How many lawyers can tell a judge that the judge was wrong on something in the past and have the judge respond with a smile? They had great banter. Btw, much respect to this judge who challenged Mr. Madel at every turn. I think I witnessed Mr. Madel's flow state. At certain moments, it was really hard not to cheer. It'll be up to 60 days before we know the judge's decision. The judge may perhaps be reluctant to set precedent under UPEPA. No matter the outcome, if I ever need legal representation, I'm calling Mr. Madel's firm.
Feb 07, 2025 · Carrie LundellAbsolutely outstanding work holding District Attorney Moriarty accountable for her shameful and unethical prosecution of Officer Londregran. We need more good attorneys like you in the world!
Jun 07, 2024 · Mister JonI had two cases, one in 2015 out of state and in 2018 here in MN and both of the times I have been helped with respect and have nothing but positive experience with Madel Pa law firm. After first case Christopher madel, the owner and lead attorney made great impression of just a great person himself and professional and caring lawyer and showed great leadership in his office. So when I needed a great attorney a few years later I came back to Madel PA. This time one of the colleagues Todd was working on my case he did a great job. They can handle different types and levels of cases. Definitely recommend. Thank you for a great job!
Mar 15, 2019 · Gino BilanoOutstanding, Chris shows the good an attorney can do, unlike the clown in the Hennepin County Attorney's office!
Jun 07, 2024 · dino00555800 La Salle Ave Suite 2260, Minneapolis, MN 55402, USA
30 S 9th St #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402, USA
800 La Salle Ave #2150, Minneapolis, MN 55402, USA
528 Hennepin Ave Unit 309, Minneapolis, MN 55403, USA
33 South 6th St, Minneapolis, MN 55402, USA
80 S 8th St #5120, Minneapolis, MN 55402, USA