Ross, Midian & Breitmayer, LLC

When seeking legal representation in Ohio, choosing the right firm is a decision that often comes with careful consideration. Ross, Midian & Breitmayer, LLC, located in Columbus, is one such firm that has served the local community. As with any service provider, public feedback can offer insights into the client experience. While some clients have reported positive outcomes and strong professional support from individual attorneys within the firm, particularly highlighting the expertise of attorneys like Marty Midian, it is also important for prospective clients to be aware of the full spectrum of experiences shared by past clients, including those concerning administrative interactions. Understanding these varied perspectives can help individuals in Ohio make informed decisions when considering legal counsel.

For anyone in Ohio contemplating legal services, a comprehensive understanding of a firm goes beyond just the attorneys' skills; it extends to the overall client experience. While Marty Midian has been praised for his professionalism, knowledge, and supportive approach in resolving cases with the "best possible outcome," and for making clients "feel like he had my back the entire way," other reviews highlight significant concerns regarding administrative interactions. These conflicting experiences underscore the importance of thorough research and direct communication when evaluating legal representation. The firm’s presence in Columbus indicates a local commitment, but potential clients should weigh all available public information to ensure the firm aligns with their expectations for both legal expertise and client service.

Ross, Midian & Breitmayer, LLC is situated at 846 S High St, Columbus, OH 43206, USA. This location places the firm conveniently within Columbus, Ohio, making it accessible for residents in the state capital and its surrounding areas. Being in a central part of Columbus typically means the office is reachable via various transportation methods, including personal vehicles and potentially public transit, although specific transit routes would depend on an individual's starting point. For those driving, standard city parking options may be available in the vicinity. The firm's presence in Columbus suggests a familiarity with local court systems, procedures, and the legal community, which can be an advantage when navigating legal matters within Franklin County and beyond. While the physical location offers accessibility, potential clients should also consider the broader aspects of client experience as highlighted in public feedback when deciding on legal representation.

While a comprehensive list of specific practice areas for Ross, Midian & Breitmayer, LLC is not extensively detailed in the provided information, the nature of legal firms typically allows them to handle a range of cases. Client testimonials, such as the one for Marty Midian, suggest that the firm engages in litigation or case resolution that can lead to "best possible outcome," implying an active role in legal proceedings. Based on the common services offered by general practice law firms in Ohio, and given the nature of the feedback, typical services could potentially include:

• General Legal Consultation: Providing advice and guidance on various legal issues.
• Litigation and Dispute Resolution: Representing clients in court or through alternative dispute resolution methods to resolve legal conflicts.
• Negotiation: Engaging in discussions and bargaining to reach favorable settlements for clients.
• Case Management: Handling the administrative and strategic aspects of legal cases from initiation to resolution.

The highly positive review for Marty Midian indicates strong capabilities in managing and resolving complex cases, suggesting expertise in legal strategy and client advocacy. However, it is always recommended to contact the firm directly to inquire about their specific practice areas and how they align with your legal needs.

Ross, Midian & Breitmayer, LLC presents a mixed but insightful set of features and highlights, gleaned from client feedback. These include:

• Skilled and Compassionate Attorney (Marty Midian): A standout feature is the praise for attorney Marty Midian, who is described as "professional, knowledgeable, and supportive." Clients felt he "had my back the entire way" and highly recommend him as "a skilled and compassionate attorney." This highlights a strong individual legal professional within the firm.
• Positive Case Outcomes: Marty Midian's expertise and dedication reportedly led to cases being "resolved with the best possible outcome," indicating effective legal strategy and strong advocacy.
• Client Advocacy: The sentiment of feeling truly supported and that the attorney "had my back" suggests a high level of personal commitment to the client's interests.
• Concerns with Administrative Staff Interaction (Ms. Williams): A significant highlight, albeit a negative one, is the detailed account of extreme rudeness, belittlement, and threats from a staff member identified as Ms. Williams. This includes being spoken over, being told when she could speak, threats of unauthorized bank withdrawals, and being called "sensitive and rude" and "difficult."
• Perceived Aggressive Debt Collection Tactics: The account of Ms. Williams threatening to draft money from a bank account and claiming to represent the Ohio Attorney General's Office to "pursue action" against the client, regardless of its legal veracity, points to a concerning administrative approach to payment or collections.
• Lack of Professionalism in Client Communication: The direct hanging up on a client and the general tone described by Ms. Williams ("too sensitive and difficult") reflect a severe lapse in professional communication standards from at least one staff member.

This dichotomy of feedback suggests that while legal professionals like Marty Midian may offer excellent service, the overall client experience can be significantly impacted by administrative interactions.

Given the nature of the provided reviews, which highlight both highly positive experiences with an attorney and severely negative experiences with administrative staff, it is not appropriate to invent or promote any specific "promotions or special offers" for Ross, Midian & Breitmayer, LLC. Law firms generally do not advertise specific discounts in the same way retail businesses do, but many offer initial consultations.

It is always advisable for prospective clients in Ohio to contact the firm directly to inquire about their consultation policies. This direct communication would also provide an opportunity to gauge the professionalism and responsiveness of the administrative staff firsthand. By engaging directly, individuals can assess the overall client experience before committing to legal services. Transparency from the firm regarding any client support policies or processes, particularly in light of varied feedback, would be beneficial for prospective clients.

To contact Ross, Midian & Breitmayer, LLC, you can use the following information:

• Address: 846 S High St, Columbus, OH 43206, USA
• Phone: (614) 228-4488
• Mobile Phone: +1 614-228-4488

Prospective clients are encouraged to utilize these contact details to schedule a consultation or inquire directly about the firm's services and client support protocols. Engaging directly allows for a personal assessment of the firm's responsiveness and overall professionalism, which can be crucial in making an informed decision about legal representation.

For locals in Ohio, the suitability of Ross, Midian & Breitmayer, LLC presents a mixed picture that requires careful consideration. On one hand, the firm appears to house highly competent and compassionate legal professionals, as evidenced by the glowing review for Marty Midian, who is lauded for his expertise, support, and ability to achieve excellent outcomes. For individuals whose cases directly involve an attorney like Marty Midian, the firm could be a strong contender for effective legal representation. However, the deeply concerning account of an interaction with a staff member named Ms. Williams, describing extreme rudeness, belittlement, and aggressive communication tactics, raises significant questions about the firm's overall client service and administrative professionalism. This disparity suggests that while the legal counsel itself might be strong, the broader client experience, particularly concerning initial or administrative interactions, could be highly challenging. Therefore, while certain attorneys within the firm may be suitable, locals in Ohio are advised to approach with caution, conducting thorough due diligence that extends beyond attorney qualifications to include a direct assessment of the administrative support and overall client service environment before engaging their services.